New Concept Art From Cancelled TimeSplitters Game Appears – Game Rant

Fans of the ill-fated TimeSplitters series are getting a glimpse of what could have been if the fourth TimeSplitters title wasn’t cancelled. A massive trove of unreleased concept art from developer Free Radical Design was made available to the public via Reddit, and it showcases a wide range of characters from various time periods and fantasy worlds.

The three existing TimeSplitters games, TimeSplitters 1, TimeSplitters 2, and TimeSplitters: Future Perfect, received widespread acclaim. The developer, now defunct, was mostly comprised of employees who had previously worked for Rare on GoldenEye 007 and Perfect Dark.
In 2007, a fourth game in the series was said to be in production. However, the studio was acquired by Crytek and relabeled Crytek UK in 2009, and since then fans of TimeSplitters have all but given up on the possibility. Now, those fans get an inside look at what the game could’ve looked like had it been made.

Devoted fans of the franchise have taken it upon themselves to create a new TimeSplitters game, which after five years in development, received a trailer last year. The project is an effort to replicate the single-player and multiplayer experiences from the first three TimeSplitters games. The team behind TimeSplitters Rewind were aiming for a partial release in late 2017, which obviously didn’t happen, and there hasn’t been any indication of a revised release window.

For now, the small team behind TimeSplitters Rewind represents the only hope for the future of the franchise. As such, they released a short video diary last year chronicling the project’s development, opening the curtain to reveal various art design, gameplay, and technical details.

One of TimeSplitters‘ distinguishing traits that helped it attract such a devoted following was its large and diverse selection of characters. Essentially, characters that appeared in the single-player arcade mode were also playable characters in the multiplayer mode. Everything from the hero and villain to ghosts and zombies were playable in the TimeSplitters universe. The game incentivized long-term player engagement by making players unlock characters through challenges.

Two levels from TimeSplitters 2 are hidden in the 2016 first-person shooter, Homefront: The Revolution, a testament to the TimeSplitters series’ staying power.
TimeSplitters Rewind does not have an official release date as of this reporting.

Source: Reddit

Hey, thank for your visiting to this post . I wish this post provide some useful informations about technology for you.
Thanks…!!! 🙂
The content sourced from:

Honor 7C review (hands on): A dual-lens smartphone with an 18:9 display at a rock-bottom price

Huawei’s Honor brand is becoming synonymous with value for money. Recently it’s impressed us with the Honor 7X, an 18:9 dual-lens smartphone with a powerful Kirin 655 processor, which can currently be had for a very reasonable £240. The Honor 9 Lite has made a big impression too, again offering an 18:9 screen and twin cameras, this time for just £170.
Now the company has unveiled a second handset at that same temptingly low price: the Honor 7C once more comes with an 18:9 display and a dual-lens camera, plus an eight-core processor, for just £170. Is it Honor’s best bargain yet, or a redundant addition to the roster?
READ NEXT: Motorola Moto G5S review: Is this the best budget smartphone yet?
Honor 7C UK release date and price
The Honor 7C will be available exclusively from the HiHonor store in early May 2018 for £170 – the same price as the Honor 9 Lite, and £70 less than the 7X.
It comes in two colours – black and blue – and unlike the all-new budget Honor 7A, it will only be sold SIM-free, so you won’t see any contract deals.
READ NEXT: Honor 9 Lite review: A great budget phone with an 18:9 display and a dual front-facing camera
Honor 7C review: Technical specifications

Display: 5.99in 18:9 (720 x 1,440) IPS
Processor: 1.8GHz octa-core Snapdragon 450
Storage: 32GB (expandable by up to 256GB via microSD)
Camera: 13+2-megapixel rear f/1-f/7 (PDAF, no OIS); 8-megapixel front with “Soft Light”
Connectivity: 2.4GHz 802.11n Wi-Fi; Bluetooth 4.2; 3.5mm headphone jack; microUSB
Battery: 3,000mAh
Dimensions: 158.3 x 76.7 x 7.8mm
Operating system: Android 8 (EMUI 8)
Colours: Black and Blue
Price: £170
Availability: Early May 2018

Honor 7C review: Build quality and design
The 7C has a lot in common with the much-loved Honor 8 Pro. It boasts a similarly beautiful all-aluminium unibody design, though here it’s stretched out to an 18:9 aspect ratio, which is great for browsing the web or scrolling through your Facebook feed. It’s slightly chunkier, measuring 7.8mm thick versus the ultra-thin 6.97mm of the Honor 8 Pro, but it still feels agreeably slim in the hand.
Indeed, the same design and build quality philosophy are evident all around the phone. Curved edges on all sides make the 7C easy to grip, and at the back there’s a fingerprint sensor and a dual-lens camera with dual-tone LED flash.
At the right-hand side sit the volume rocker and power button, while at the left there’s a three-in-one card slot – an unusual convenience, allowing you to simultaneously use two SIM cards and a microSD card.
As with the Honor 9 Lite, there’s a microUSB port at the bottom, alongside a downward-firing speaker and a 3.5mm headphone jack. Inside, a 3,000mAh battery provides the juice.
READ NEXT: Best budget smartphone 2018: The cheap phones you need to buy in 2018
Honor 7C camera, performance and Face Unlock
Just like the Honor 9 Lite, the 7C features a rear-facing dual-lens 13+2-megapixel camera (f/1-f/7 aperture) with Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), and it’s backed up with a dual-tone LED flash, as previously seen on the Honor 8 Pro. All the usual shooting modes and functions are here, including panorama and bokeh, so image quality should be a match for any other budget handset, though, it doesn’t feature Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS).
What’s new is what’s on the other side: the Honor 7C’s single 8-megapixel front-facing camera now has its own “Soft Light” illuminator. This can help you get much better selfies in low light, with the illumination level adjustable through the camera app. It’s worth noting, though, that the Honor 9 Lite’s dual 13+2-megapixel front-facing camera is still likely to capture sharper, more detailed selfies.
Inside the Honor 7C, there’s an eight-core Snapdragon 450 processor, with 3GB of RAM and 32GB of internal storage, which can be expanded by up to 256GB through the microSD card slot. That’s enough power to keep Android 8 feeling perfectly snappy – although if performance is important to you then the Honor 9 Lite again wins out with its faster Kirin 659 processor.
One area where the Honor 7C excels is security. In addition to your regular Android unlock methods, it offers both fingerprint unlocking and facial recognition. For a sub-£200 phone, that’s impressive, and if Honor is using the same technology as found in its flagship Honor View 10 then it should be a supremely quick and accurate way to unlock the phone. The Face Unlock feature won’t be available at launch, but it’s slated for an update a few weeks later.
READ NEXT: Vodafone Smart V8 review: The £159 Moto G5 rival
Honor 7C early verdict
On paper, the Honor 7C might look like an inferior sibling to the identically priced Honor 9 Lite, with a slower processor and less capable front camera. It has a bigger screen in its favour, though, measuring 5.99in across the diagonal versus the 5.65in of the 9 Lite; throw in Honor’s Face Unlock technology and the stage is set for an interesting showdown. Stay tuned for a full review in the coming weeks.

Thank you for your visiting on this page , We hope this post can be a good reference for you and provide useful information for you :-).
The content sourced from:

Sony Xperia XZ2: A phenomenal camera that’s poorly implemented

A new ISP allows for new functions
Sony finally did an upgrade in the camera department in its new flagship. The Motion Eye camera (as the company calls it) has not changed its physical characteristics since the previous generation, and Sony is once again using the 19 megapixel IMX400 sensor and f/2.0 aperture lenses that we’ve already seen on the Xperia XZ1, XZ Premium and XZs.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 camera again has a buffer memory close to the sensor, allowing the device to boast exclusive features that aren’t yet available on competitive smartphones. Specifically, the photographic compartment of the new Sony integrates an Exmor RS sensor with a 1/2.3” stacked memory (positioned very close to the sensor) with 1.22μm pixels and a 25mm wide-angle G Lens.
The smartphone is able to capture photos with ISO up to 12800 due to the combined work of the sensor and the brand’s updated mobile BIONZ image processor. The maximum ISO is 4000 when shooting videos.

In terms of design, the XZ2 isn’t bad at all, but you’ll end up always putting your finger on the camera trying to unlock the device. / © AndroidPIT

Thanks to this ISP, the smartphone is capable of some amazing tricks, including Predictive Capture. When motion is detected, this feature continuously captures what you’re framing and stores the photos of the fractions of time immediately before and after you press the dedicated button, and then lets you choose the best shot from the 4 that have been stored.
Another function that was already present on the Sony Xperia XZ1 is the Autofocus burst that allows you to keep the subject in focus during a series of exposures. This is possible thanks to the Predictive Hybrid Autofocus used by Sony in the Motion Eye camera.

The camera also features an autofocus laser, a color temperature sensor, and an LED flash. / © AndroidPIT

Obviously there’s a slow motion mode at 960 fps, as Sony was the first to use this mode for video recording. This feature has now progressed from 720p to 1080p, once again demonstrating Sony’s superiority once when it comes to photographic hardware in the smartphone industry. Sony Xperia XZ2 is also capable of recording 4K HDR 10bit video for video editing enthusiasts.
The front camera is disappointing and remains at just 5 megapixels at 1/5” size with 23mm lenses at a f/2.2 aperture with a maximum ISO of 1600 for photos and 1000 for videos. Both cameras support Sony’s 5-axis EIS SteadyShot electronic stabilization.
Ok, that’s great on paper, but what about in practice?
In practice, as always, Sony fails to surprise us. It’s incredible how the manufacturer of the sensors used by the best smartphone cameras in the world (including the Pixel 2 XL and Huawei P20 Pro, to name just two) isn’t able to achieve better results than the competition, even when they use exclusive hardware not yet sold to third parties (remember that most smartphones still use sensors from the IMX3xx series).
Yes, I was able to take some wonderful photos in very difficult and particular lighting conditions, but in most cases the results didn’t satisfy me at all. Many of the shots taken ‘on the fly’ inevitably ended up in the trash because they were completely unusable, and as someone accustomed to smartphones like the Pixel 2 XL, iPhone X and Galaxy S9+, I must admit that I was very disappointed.
Here’s a small example. This shot was taken while I was crossing the street, so in motion, on one of the streets in Berlin near where I live:

A very successful shot despite difficult lighting conditions. / © AndroidPIT / Luca Zaninello

This shot, which to be honest I’m very proud of, is definitely good despite the difficult lighting conditions and the fact that I was walking and not keep my smartphone motionless certainly didn’t help. The Superior Auto mode (Sony’s automatic mode) worked well by keeping the details of the building and people crossing the street without processing the photo too much and blurring the details of well-lit objects.
If you zoom in on people, you’ll notice a bit of grain, but all in all it’s not bad. But then if you look at the next shot, taken at a pasta restaurant on a bright day with the smartphone in a stable position: it’s a complete disaster. The photo even seems out of focus since so little detail was captured by the Sony Xperia XZ2.

It’s not a shot I’d post on Instagram…  / © AndroidPIT / Luca Zaninello

The same applies to videos that aren’t at the level of the competition, either in terms of color representation or stabilization. One example is this pair of videos taken at speed in Brussels (it was raining a lot, so I’m sorry for this barfy shot) that I recorded to compare a video in 4K@60fps on the iPhone X with a 4K@30fps HDR video from Sony.

Not only does the video recorded with the iPhone X look smoother with its 60 frames per second, it also seems to have a greater dynamic range than the Xperia XZ2 in HDR mode. Also note that the video recorded with the Xperia XZ2 has a frame rate that isn’t very constant and starts to look like different ‘shots’. The results in 1080p@30fps HDR are much more encouraging, as demonstrated by the video recorded by my colleague Eric with the XZ2 Compact, which uses the same camera and the same software.
The Super slow motion mode has significantly improved in comparison to the previous generation due to increased resolution, and is certainly much more effective than the 720p variants used by competitors. The problems remain the same, however, as it requires a large amount of light and superhuman hand-eye coordination to click the slow motion button at the right time. Recording at 960fps still has the usual limit of 0.182 seconds, which is slowed down to 6 seconds in playback.
Sony’s biggest problem is (again) the software
Sony doesn’t have problems with being undersized or having poorly implemented photographic hardware. The photo processing hardware is fast enough and the sensor is sufficiently capable of good shots, but the software is clearly inferior to that of Sony’s competition. The improvement from the XZ1 are there and are obvious, but the overall result won’t justify purchasing this device over some other competitor.
Just consider panorama or bokeh shooting modes. Both are still treated as separate applications from the main app. The bokeh mode is a disaster and can’t correctly recognize the edges of a subject in the picture, resulting in pretty forgettable shots.

No Sony, we’re not buying it.  / © AndroidPIT

Even the manual mode doesn’t have the useful controls photography enthusiasts and experts have come to love. These functions offer only partial control over the results. To name one example, the maximum exposure time is only 1 second. So don’t expect to take pictures of a starry sky, like you can with a high-end Honor or Huawei device.

Redesigning the camera app wouldn’t hurt. / © AndroidPIT

In the era of photography dominated by artificial intelligence and strong software components, you can’t be content with mediocre photo processing and some nice features like high-resolution Super Slow Motion.
The 3D Creator feature, which is now also available using the front camera, also shows how Sony can lead the photography industry with its smartphones. It’s also clear that the company uses its smartphones as technical demos of its new technologies that the company then sells to other manufacturers under license and that the company isn’t interested in dominating the market with its own smartphones.
Users have become increasingly demanding and ‘spoiled’ when it comes to smartphone photography. In my opinion they’re justified in demanding the best possible camera functions if they spend 700 dollars on a device.

Opinion by Luca Zaninello

A smartphone that costs 700 dollars has to guarantee the best possible photographic experience.
What do you think?

Don’t get me wrong, there are many other reasons to purchase the Xperia XZ2, such as its excellent display, top performance and excellent battery life. But if you’re interested in buying a top-range smartphone mainly for photographic use, my advice would be to invest your money in something more reliable.

Thank you for your visit on this page
The content sourced from:

Fitbit Versa review

FITBIT unveiled its latest smartwatch, the Fitbit Versa, in March, boasting of a new lightweight design, more personalisations and a battery life that’ll last for more than four days. 
The new device builds on the success of the Fitbit Ionic which was released in November last year and is positioned not as a replacement but as an alternative with slightly fewer tricks, such as lack of inbuilt GPS, but with a lower price point of £199.
Since its launch, we’ve been putting the watch through its paces on a daily basis to see how it compares not only to its predecessor but also other smartwatches in the market. Here’s what we think of it.
DesignWith the Versa, Fitbit hasn’t just updated the design of one of its previous or existing wearables like a lot of brands do in this space; it’s given it a completely new look.
One thing you’ll notice, though, is that it’s perhaps more Apple Watch-y than any of its previous releases, boasting what the health tech giant is calling a “Squircle” watchface design. Don’t worry, we’re cringing too. 

Despite its offensive design name, the Fitbit Versa is a much more handsome and friendly-looking watch than many of the firm’s previous devices, especially the Ionic, which we have to admit we weren’t the biggest fans of. In comparison, the Versa is pretty nondescript and thus harmless looking, ensuring your eyes are left to concentrate more on what’s happening on the display than around it.
The Versa isn’t only nice to look at, as it’s also one of the most comfortable smartwatches Fitbit has made thanks to its lighter weight. Fitbit claims its one of its lightest smartwatches on the market due to its ultra-thin, anodised aluminium case and slightly-tapered and angled design that has been built to fit small or large wrists. However, this lightweight design does make the Versa feel a little cheap.

As for the Versa’s display, it’s a vibrant, colourful touchscreen with a brightness up to 1,000 nits. This means that even in direct sunlight or underwater it’s easily visible, even when not turned up to the maximum brightness capacity. Touch commands also seem to be much improved over the Ionic, are now more fluid and uninterrupted.
Performance and battery lifeThe most important thing about a smartwatch isn’t just how it looks, but how it performs; and how long it lasts before you need to go out of your way to charge it again. Fitbit claims the Versa’s battery life is not quite as impressive as its bigger, more expensive sibling, and claims it’ll last four days rather than five. After using the watch for a good two weeks on and off, we were rather impressed that its stamina matched up pretty well with Fitbit’s claims.
As with any smartwatch, the total number of days you’ll get out of it is completely dependent on how many workouts you track throughout the week, if you keep it on at night time for sleep tracking, and if you have the brightness setting set to low or high.

Once it’s been fully charged and used for a full 24 hours, including two intense workouts and sleep tracking, the Versa was at a rather impressive 70 per cent capacity. After three full days, it was at just over 10 percent before finally dwindling to zero halfway through the third day.
As for actual device charging, Fitbit doesn’t opt for juicing its wearables via traditional microUSB, so if you’re travelling then the special Fitbit charger will need to make its way into your suitcase. It’s also worth noting the Versa’s proprietary charger comes with a clip-in dock (included), which makes it much easier to charge compared to the magnetic pin on the Ionic.
FeaturesTracking a workout with the Fitbit Versa is really easy and works in the exact same way as on the Ionic. Whether it’s running, cycling, swimming or HIIT that you want to track, there’s a dedicated option for this on the device’s Exercise app, accessible as the first option in the main menu carousel. This consists of Run, Bike, Swim, Treadmill, Weights, Interval Timer and Workout modes.
To track your run, for example, you’d simply select the Running tab from the Exercise option by swiping left from the home screen, then tap go and off you go.
During the exercise, the watch will display a selection of your vitals, which will differ depending on what exercise you’re tracking. For example, the running option will display distance and time, whereas the swimming option will display the lengths and meters swam alongside the time, and then the general workout option will show heart rate the calories burned. Many other tracking variables can also be seen, such as the current time, time taken, heart rate, etc by swiping left or right on the main display during the exercise tracking.

Once you’ve ended your exercise by telling the Versa you’re done, you’ll get a workout summary. These little summaries are a great touch, giving you the lowdown on your performance as soon as you’ve finished. In our running session, for instance, the Versa workout summary told us what our maximum heart rate had been in beats per minute (BPM), alongside our average BPM during the whole exercise, the time it took to complete the workout as well as the distance travelled.
As with the display during exercise, this summary changes depending on the exercise you do. After a HIIT class, in which I’d chosen the standard “workout” option, we were told how many calories we’d burned as opposed to distance travelled and time taken. This is all viewable in the app, too, after you’ve synced your watch to your smartphone, alongside all the other variables, pictured side by side with any previous workouts you’ve done.

Another impressive capability for a wearable at this price point is the swim tracking. It works very well, and accurately tracks your laps in a pool, for instance, recognising when you’ve reached the other side and kicked off to start your next lap.
What really surprised us was that the Versa is able to offer clear on-screen recordings with its brightly-lit display as we swam. It isn’t easy to swipe between the different tracking variables during this mode though, as you can imagine, as the display doesn’t recognise finger taps so well underwater.
There’s also a nifty feature called Run Detect, which was also seen on the Ionic. It means the Versa is clever enough to know when you’re taking a break, and automatically stops and starts tracking a run, swim or cycle by sensing the status of your movement.  The other good news here is that this feature doesn’t come into play if you don’t want it. Choose a standard “workout” exercise from the list before beginning circuit training, for example, and it tracks your heart rate continuously until you tell it to stop. It works really well, meaning you can get on with the workout without checking the watch all the time and making sure it’s recording your movements accurately.

Then there’s sleep tracking, too, which while not exactly a fitness feature, still works in a similar manner. If you wear the Versa to bed, it will automatically track your sleep by recognising your inactivity, stillness and decreased heart rate. A summary of your sleep pattern will then be offered within the app after waking up; displaying how long you were asleep for in total, with this time split into either REM (rapid eye movement), light and deep sleep. This analysis is provided in an easy to understand manner and spits your results against an ideal target “benchmark” of someone the same sex and age as you. 
SoftwareThe Versa comes with Fitbit’s latest OS 2.0, which includes a new dashboard that provides a more simplified and intuitive view of your health and fitness data. This includes “Stats at a glance”, which allows you to see your daily and weekly health and fitness stats, historical activity, heart rate, and exercise summaries from your wrist by simply swiping up on the main display. 
The on-screen icons are displayed very well on the Versa and in a clean way so not to confuse users. One of our favourite features in the Versa software is that Fitbit has given the watch more customisation options than ever before. This, Fitbit said, is something it has realised its customers really want, so made it a bigger focus in the development of the Versa. 
You can customise your own watch faces to make the Versa look how you want it to, something we saw a bit of in the Ionic, but this time around there’s hundreds more different designs to choose from. You can also purchase third party clock faces, some of which are customisable right down to the text colour and arrangement of data.

First seen on the Ionic, the Fitbit Pay platform is available to use on the Versa, enabling you to use to the watch to buy stuff without your phone or wallet. We tried the feature in different stores and while it didn’t work in one, it did in the other four. The feature worked relatively well but it is a little fiddly, as it requires you to input a 4 digit pin before bringing up the contactless payment screen.

At the moment, the contactless payment feature doesn’t work with many banks in the UK yet, either, so we wouldn’t advise this being one of the main reasons why you buy the Versa. So far that list includes just Danske Bank and Starling Bank, so pretty limited. Fitbit has said it’s working to rectify this, though so it could change soon.
In shortWhile its feature set isn’t quite that of its bigger sibling the Ionic, the Fitbit Versa feels very much like the same watch but with a much more welcoming design. And let’s not forget that lower price of £100.
This is what made the Ionic somewhat difficult to recommend. Despite there being so many features, it was just a little too expensive compared to all the other wearable options out there.
Saying that, the Versa has completely changed the game for Fitbit at least, as you can now get your hands on some great fitness tracking features that all sync with the really well designed Fitbit app for much less than before. It’s essentially a really good option for those that really wanted the Ionic but thought it was just that bit too pricey to justify it the splurge.  
In the UK, the Fitbit Versa is available to buy for £199, with colour options of silver, black or rose gold as well as several watch strap colour combinations. 

The goodNice lightweight design, customisable, relatively low price for the feature set.
The badBattery life not as good as Ionic.
The uglyA little cheap feeling.
Bartender’s Score 8/10

Thank you have visited this post . We wish could be additional information about technology for you

Watch SpaceX launch NASA’s new planet-hunting satellite here – TechCrunch

It’s almost time for SpaceX to launch NASA’s TESS, a space telescope that will search for exoplants across nearly the entire night sky. The launch has been delayed more than once already: originally scheduled for March 20, it slipped to April 16 (Monday), then some minor issues pushed it to today — at 3:51 PM Pacific time, to be precise. You can watch the launch live below.
TESS, which stands for Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite, is basically a giant wide-angle camera (four of them, actually) that will snap pictures of the night sky from a wide, eccentric and never before tried orbit.
The technique it will use is fundamentally the same as that employed by NASA’s long-running and highly successful Kepler mission. When distant plants pass between us and their star, it causes a momentary decrease in that star’s brightness. TESS will monitor thousands of stars simultaneously for such “transits,” watching a single section of sky for a month straight before moving on to another.
By two years, it will have imaged 85 percent of the sky — hundreds of times the area Kepler observed, and on completely different stars: brighter ones that should yield more data.
TESS, which is about the size of a small car, will launch on top of a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket. SpaceX will attempt to recover the first stage of the rocket by having it land on a drone ship, and the nose cone will, hopefully, get a gentle parachute-assisted splashdown in the Atlantic, where it too can be retrieved.
The feed below should go live 15 minutes before launch, or at about 3:35.

Thank for visiting my site, I hope you can find some useful information from this post: .
Thanks… 🙂
The content sourced from:

Facebook is testing a way to let people watch video premieres in Facebook Live

Although the ability to publish pre-recorded video to Facebook Live has been an option for some time, it’s required the use of third-party programs like OBS and Wirecast. Now, Facebook is testing a feature called Premieres, which will let creators publish already-made videos to Facebook Live, as reported today by Engadget.
While there isn’t much information on Premieres yet, it appears to be angled toward content like movie trailers, Facebook Watch shows, and music videos, and it would come with Facebook Live functions like chat. Essentially, it’s a way for publishers to bring the experience of a television premiere or film trailer drop to Facebook, allowing people to experience a new video together in real time. “We’re testing this now with a group of diverse video creators, publishers, and shows,” Facebook’s Fidji Simo tells Deadline. “And we’ll be rolling this out more broadly soon.”
The ability to natively publish pre-recorded content would certainly make sense for Facebook, which has been expanding its stable of original series. Facebook recently ordered a dramedy series starring Avengers: Infinity War star Elizabeth Olsen, as well as a 10-episode fairy tale horror series called Sacred Lies. It’s reported that the company plans on spending up to $1 billion on original TV in 2018. The Verge has reached out to Facebook for comment on how exactly Premieres differs from the existing tools that let creators publish pre-recorded video to its Live platform.
Thank you for your visit to this page . I hope this article can provide benefits to you.

Fernando Tatis had the greatest half-inning in MLB history

Let’s take some time to remember the night Fernando Tatis set a record that will never be broken
Fernando Tatis was an excellent, exciting, young player in 1999. This is, perhaps, the most important piece of context to the story of his two grand slams in the same inning. Back then, he was the future of the Cardinals, and considering that Mark McGwire was going to be around forever, the future was bright indeed. When tasked to choose any third baseman in baseball for the upcoming decade, Rob Neyer chose Tatis.
It turns out that Tatis wouldn’t be the best third baseman on the Cardinals within two years. He floated away, left the game, and drifted back to the Mets for a surprising renaissance toward the end of the decade, but the once-likely stardom wasn’t to be.
He’ll have to be satisfied with one of the most amazing and unlikely baseball feats of all-time. Which is a pretty nifty consolation prize.
Consider that only 13 players in baseball history have hit two grand slams in one game. Anthony Rizzo, a slugger who was healthy all year and hit in the middle of a potent lineup, had only 27 plate appearances with the bases loaded for the entire 2017 season. The opportunities to hit two grand slams in the same inning just aren’t going to be there for most people. It’s not only possible for players to have a 20-year career without getting two at-bats with the bases loaded in the same inning, it’s overwhelmingly likely.
Tatis got those at-bats, and he slugged two grand slams. He hit a home run in 5.3 percent of his plate appearances that season, which meant the odds of him hitting two home runs in that inning were already close to .3 percent. Now factor in the odds of his teammates loading the bases ahead of him twice … then, uh, divide by the odds of any pitcher stinking that hard, and … uh, add the reciprocal of an entire lineup not making three outs in the time it takes to load the bases twice and get the same guy up with a chance to hit a grand slam … you have to account for the lousy defense, too … wait, let me take off my socks and start over.
The point is that this is an unbreakable record. The beauty of it is that it doesn’t require an eon of baseball to be played, like Cal Ripken’s consecutive games streak. It can happen tonight in any of the games played. It could happen tomorrow, the next day … anyone can tie the record, really.
But they won’t. Which is why we have come here today to celebrate Fernando Danged Tatis, who definitely did that baseball thing we still talk about today. It will never stop being hard to comprehend.
Thanks for your visiting on this page , We hope this post can be a good reference for you and provide useful information for you :-).
This article is sourced from:

Gennady Golovkin to fight Vanes Martirosyan on 5 May in Los Angeles | Sport

Gennady Golovkin’s plans for Cinco de Mayo weekend are finally set, even if it’s not the against the opponent or in the city he wanted.
The unbeaten WBA, WBC and IBF middleweight champion will defend his titles against Vanes Martirosyan on 5 May at the StubHub Center in Carson, California.
Golovkin (37-0-1, 33 KOs), the crowd-pleasing Kazakh knockout artist, had originally been slated to fight Canelo Álvarez at the T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas in a rematch of their September blockbuster, which ended in a controversial split draw.
But the Mexican star pulled out of the highly anticipated bout after failing two drug tests in February, forcing Golovkin’s team to scramble to find a replacement opponent.

“Vanes Martirosyan is now the most important fight of my career. He has my respect and I am training hard to defend my titles against him,” Golovkin said in a release. “I am happy to be back on HBO and fighting at StubHub Center because they have great boxing fans. I will give my fans another big drama show.”
By taking a relatively low-risk fight with Martirosyan, who has not fought in two years and who lost his last outing, Golovkin risks being stripped his IBF title by failing to take a bout with the organization’s mandatory challenger: Russia’s Sergiy Derevyanchenko (12-0, 10 KOs).
Golovkin has said he hopes to fight Álvarez in September, provided the Mexican’s temporary suspension by the Nevada Athletic Commission has been lifted by then. Their first fight sold 1.3m pay-per-views in the United States and generated a live gave of more than $27m, the third-highest in boxing history.
More to follow.

Thanks for your visiting on this page , We hope this post can be a good reference for you and provide useful information for you :-).
This article is sourced from:

Harrison Phillips may not be a 1st-round pick, but he will make a defense better

Retired NFL defensive end Stephen White says there’s always an important role to play for a defensive tackle who’s strong AF like Stanford’s Phillips.
No need in beating around the bush, so I will start by saying that I see Harrison Phillips as an early down defensive lineman in the NFL with not a whole lot of value on passing downs. As such, I wouldn’t take him in the first round.
That’s just my philosophy. It goes for any defensive line prospect who can’t rush the passer on third down. I felt the same way about Andrew Billings when he came out in fact.
That doesn’t mean Phillips won’t have a good career. No matter where any of the guys I break down ultimately get drafted, I believe that my evaluation of their college tape and projection of how they will play in the pros is what matters the most. After all, it’s not where you start but where you finish when it comes to playing in the NFL.
The same goes for Phillips who did some really good things as a run defender, and who has the potential to get some decent pass rushes on early downs, regardless.
So let me get into the things I believe Phillips did do well in college and how I think it will project on the next level.
Phillips is strong AF.
At least when it comes to his upper body.
I didn’t need him lifting 225 pounds 42 times at the combine for me to know that, but it certainly was confirmation of what I saw on tape.
Stanford primarily used Phillips at nose tackle in one form or another. A lot of plays he would be head up on the center, while on other plays he would line up somewhere in either A gap. Just in case you weren’t aware, those are the prime alignments to end up getting double teamed.
Phillips was able to consistently shoot his hands inside and and bench press one blocker off of him which allowed him to hold up well most of the time when the second offensive lineman came in to try to finish him off.
Being able to keep one guy at bay also allowed Philips to expand and make plays once the other blocker slid off him to try to block someone on the second level.
When Phillips did find himself singled up, he was able to knock the center or guard back into the backfield when they tried to base block him or reach block him. That often led to him either making a tackle himself for a short gain or forcing the running back to cut back to Phillips’ teammates.
The real fun, however, came when opposing offenses tried to run counter plays and had either the center or the guard who wasn’t pulling try to single block Phillips on a down block.

Phillips may not be a world class sprinter, but he has a few things going for him on those counter plays.
One, he obviously understands blocking schemes and can recognize them very quickly.

Two, he also had really good technique coordinating his footwork, side stepping the blocker with swim moves that freed him up to pursue the runner at or behind the line of scrimmage.

Finally, Phillips is kinda quick in short areas. He appeared to catch quite a few of those interior offensive linemen off guard in the four games that I watched.

As someone who really appreciates defensive linemen who win with technique, watching Phillips play the run was quite entertaining at times.
He also had a serious knack for getting in on the play when the ball was run in his immediate area.
I can’t even tell you how many times I had to re-watch one of his plays because he would be engaged with a blocker and it would look like Phillips had no chance to get to the runner only to see Phillips escape off the block and reach out to make the play.

All together in four games Phillips notched four tackles for a loss along with 27 other tackles which is damned impressive for a guy who played as much nose tackle as he did.
As a pass rusher, Phillips’ skills and technique kind of mirrored what he did against the run.
When he committed to a bull rush he was able to use his impressive upper body strength to get most blockers knocked back into the quarterback’s lap pretty good if he was singled up.
He was also able to beat offensive linemen with quick finesse moves where he used the same kind of side-step and swim move to get several clean wins.
The problem was that even when Phillips got those clean wins he still wasn’t usually able to either take the quarterback down or effect the throw.
It’s not like Phillips had a lot of clean wins rushing the passer in the first place, but when he did have a chance to take down a quarterback it often didn’t end well.

That is was led me to my conclusion that Phillips probably won’t be a third-down pass rusher in the league.
It’s not like Phillips had a lot of good pass rush opportunities anyway since he lined up so much as the nose tackle, but to be a legit pass rusher he needed to convert more of those one-on-one wins.
Unfortunately, he couldn’t and that’s how he ended up with only a half a sack and two pressures in the games I watched.
So you have a guy who can get a good push against the run or the pass, who wins with really good technique, who has a knack for making tackles in his immediate vicinity, but who is also limited as an athlete and has a hard time getting to the quarterback.
That doesn’t exactly scream first round pick, does it?
But that’s ok!
Every team needs guys who can play the hell out of the run on first and second downs, especially a guy who may be able to hold the point and sneak in a good pass rush from time to time as well.
Phillips could play all across the defensive line in a base 3-4 on early downs from a five technique to a zero nose. He would also make a fine nose tackle in a 4-3 as well. Because his technique is so good, he is ready to play right away.
So while I wouldn’t spend a first round pick on Harrison Phillips, I still think he definitely has the potential to have a fine career as a run stopper in the NFL. If your team drafts him in the second round or later I don’t think you will ever complain about it provided he is able to stay healthy.

Since I don’t have access to all-22 for college football games I use the next best thing for my draft profiles and go to Draft Breakdown where they post the TV copy of a bunch of top prospects’ games already cut up and ready to go. This time Draft Breakdown only had three of Harrison Phillip’s games from last season on their website, so I had to use Google to find one more. For the purposes of this breakdown I watched Phillips play against USC, Washington, Cal and Notre Dame. Those represented the second, tenth, eleventh, and twelfth games on Stanford’s schedule last season, respectively.

Thanks for your visiting on this page , We hope this post can be a good reference for you and provide useful information for you :-).
This article is sourced from:

What Is Google Home? Everything You Need To Know [User Guide]

Paul Briden

18/04/2018 – 1:33pm

Confused about what Google Home is and what it can do? We're here to help

While the smart speaker market is reportedly booming, it is fair to say that the tech is still young and there are plenty of people out there who don’t know what it’s all about – or even that smart speakers are a thing.
You might have heard someone mention Google Home in passing, or seen an ad for it, and be wondering about it – that’s what this article is for; to fill in the blanks about what Google Home is and why you might be interested.
What Is Google Home?
Google Home is really many things, but first and foremost it’s a series of speakers. There are, at present, three models in the range:

Google Home
Google Home Mini
Google Home Max

I’ll go over how each of these are different in a moment. First of all though, it’s important to understand that Google Home speakers are not just speakers; they’re SMART Speakers.
What do I mean by this? Well the other thing that Google Home “is” – as well as being a set of hardware – is a software ecosystem driven by artificial intelligence (AI) which is plugged right into the internet, and which leverages Google’s vast library of search data to make use of said worldwide web.
What Can Google Home Do?
Think of it being a bit like the Google search on your web browser – you can type anything into that and it’ll bring up a boat-load of relevant information. The difference is Google Home is voice activated and will speak back the information to you.
But wait, there’s more…
As well as being connected to the web and offering search functionality, Google Home is also integrated with Google’s suite of applications and services; that means your calendar, Gmail, Chromecast, Google Play Music and so on.  On top of this it plugs in to other third-party applications – such as Spotify, for example – so you’re not just restricted to streaming music through Google’s own platform.
So what can you actually do with Google Home? You can tell it to stream music, use it as a calculator, and ask it for various facts and bits of information it can pull from the web – – like, who holds the record for the longest spacewalk, for ert_main_wide_image/public/2017/10/google_home_review.jpg?itok=KxqQJRyc” alt=”” />

The Google Home Mini is much smaller and more discrete. It has all the same functionality as the vanilla Google Home, but is much, much cheaper at £49. However, you do sacrifice in audio quality, as the dinky size doesn’t allow for high-end speaker hardware.

Otherwise, the Max has the same functionality as its stablemates, however, the better audio hardware comes at a higher price.
Still weighing up a Google Home speaker? Check out the links below:

How To Connect SONOS To Google Home
20 Amazing Things Google Home Can Do For You Right Now

Hey, thank for your visiting to this post . I wish this post provide some useful informations about mobile technology for you.
Thanks…!!! 🙂
The contents of this article are sourced from: