Best iPad: Which iPad is best for me?

Back in March – at probably the most low-key Apple product launch we have ever been to – Apple introduced to the world the cheapest ever 9.7in iPad. While there’s hardly any difference between it and its predecessor, the new iPad’s cheaper price point does mean that the iPad market has shifted somewhat.
There are four different iPads currently available, and it can be pretty daunting – not to mention difficult – to sort out which iPad is best for you. Throw into the mix a bunch of different display sizes, features and specs, and the decision becomes pretty stressful.
To make life simple, we’ve put together this handy guide to help you figure out which iPad is the ideal iPad for you, so you don’t make one expensive mistake.
How to choose the best iPad for you
2018 9.7in iPad

Another year, another new standard model iPad. It’s nothing really all that groundbreaking, but that doesn’t mean that it’s not an excellent tablet for those looking for a good, all-purpose iPad.
With an Apple A10 Fusion processor, the 2018 iPad is, internally, a significant upgrade on the 2017 9.7in iPad. It’s visually and in most respects physically identical to the 2017 model, right down to the amount it weighs.
It’s got a beautiful 9.7in 2,048 x 1,536 display, and added support for the Apple Pencil means that if you don’t need the beefier iPad Pro, but still want to use the Pencil, you’re now able to.
If you’re just in the market for a new iPad, and don’t need something extremely powerful or excessively big, then the 2018 9.7in iPad is your best bet. It will handle all your streaming, browsing and work-related matters perfectly.
The best thing? It’s the cheapest 9.7in iPad that Apple has ever released, costing only £319 for the basic version or £409 for the 128GB Wi-Fi model (we’d recommend splashing out for the extra storage).
Read our full review here
Who is it for?
People who want a solid, all-purpose iPad that’s also pretty cheap. If you don’t need the bells and whistles of the more expensive Pro models and like the added benefit of Apple Pencil-support, go for the new 2018 9.7in iPad.
2017 10.5in iPad Pro

The all-singing, all-dancing 2017 10.5in iPad Pro is the entry-level model of the Pro range, yet it’s better than the standard model in every way except price. With a marginally bigger screen than the 2018 9.7in iPad, but with smaller bezels, it certainly looks sleek and modern compared to the basic model.
It’s also much more powerful than the basic iPad, despite being older. With a six-core A10X Fusion chip and 4GB RAM, it’s far nippier than the old iPad Pro 9.7 and the 2018 iPad. It’s an advantage when you’re running more demanding apps, while it also means that the Apple Pencil works more smoothly. Where there’s some lag, just barely noticeable, with the 2018 9.7in iPad, there’s none to be found on the Pro.
For designers and artists, the 10.5in iPad Pro is probably the best option. Taking advantage of Apple’s TrueTone technology, the 10.5in iPad Pro adjusts the colour gamut depending on the environment you’re in. This makes it easy to work on the iPad in any location, without constantly being distracted by the fact that you’re working on a tablet and not a laptop.
If you’re going to be using your iPad for work, for design or for editing, then the 10.5in iPad Pro model is a solid choice – if you can afford it.Price is probably the main drawback of both iPad Pro models’. The 10.5in iPad Pro is ridiculously expensive, costing as much as £1,000.
Read our full review here 
Who is it for?
If you can afford it, then this is the iPad to go for – and that goes double for artists or designers. It’s beautiful, it’s the perfect size and it’s incredibly powerful. But if it’s way out of your budget, the 2018 9.7in iPad is probably better, seeing as it now supports the Apple Pencil too.
2017 12.9in iPad Pro

As the biggest iPad available, the 12.9in iPad Pro basically passes as a full-blown laptop, giving you the same kind of screen real estate not to mention the same sheer power. With its all-display design, four massive speakers and impressive refresh rate, this is the prettiest, smoothest iPad around.
Editing video in 4K? You’ll have zero lag with the 12.5in iPad Pro. And the battery? It will last you a whole working day of constant use.
But with all that, it’s good to note that this probably isn’t your average consumer iPad. Everything about it, from its 12.9in display and its nippy A10X processor right up to its weighty body and its price, just screams executive.
This iPad isn’t cheap, and on top of that price, you’ll have to buy a smart keyboard to make it a true laptop replacement.
Really, the only time you should be considering this iPad is if you have the money, you’re using it for work, or you want to ditch your laptop for an iPad Pro.
Read our full review here
Who is it for?
People who need the powerhouse performance and a big 12.9in screen for work. If you prefer the larger screen and have the expendable money, then there’s no other iPad that can beat the 12.9in iPad Pro.
iPad Mini 4

It’s now well over two years since the iPad Mini 4 brought 8in tablet joy into our lives. The mini iPad has been superseded in a lot of ways by the newer 9.7in iPads, but it still might be a suitable option for you if you find the new 9.7in iPad a little too big.
While not the best iPad in terms of specs, the iPad Mini still packs a lot of punch for older hardware. With 2GB of RAM and Apple’s A8 chip, the iPad Mini is best for those who don’t want to lunk around an iPad with a massive screen.
With a manageable 7.9in display, the iPad Mini is the most portable of the entire range. It’s also a lot lighter than the other models, weighing just 299g. That said, it doesn’t have the best camera, it doesn’t have the best battery, and it’s not really all that cheap anymore, either. The 128GB iPad Mini is only £10 cheaper than the newer, faster, Pencil-popping 2018 9.7in iPad.
Read our full review here
Who is it for?
For those who want a small, portable iPad, the iPad Mini 4 finds the happy medium between the iPhone 8 Plus and the 2018 9.7in iPad. But that’s all it’s really good for.

Thank you for your visiting on this page , We hope this post can be a good reference for you and provide useful information for you :-).
The content sourced from:

Jaguars owner Shad Khan wants to put a Super Bowl in London. Don’t count on it.

There’s a couple major challenges that make a Super Bowl in London unlikely.
Jacksonville Jaguars owner Shad Khan is close to purchasing Wembley Stadium in London, but he has bigger plans than just bringing a Jaguars’ game to England once a year. Khan told BBC Sport he wants to put a Super Bowl and World Cup finals in England.
“Our role would be to provide a world-class venue,” Khan told BBC Sport. ”[The Football Association] will have a pool of money of about £600m that can be invested into the core mission of the FA, which is English football and their ultimate goal of winning a World Cup.
”Wembley is a great stadium and you want to get it configured to hold Super Bowl and World Cup finals.”
Putting a Super Bowl in London would be ambitious. Here’s just a couple of the major challenges:

The Super Bowl kicked off at 6:30 p.m. ET last year. That would be 11:30 p.m. ET in London, which isn’t ideal. The game could kickoff closer to 6:30 p.m. in London and start earlier in the United States, but it’s hard to imagine the NFL would like the idea of pulling the biggest television event of the year out of primetime.
That’s a whole lot of money going overseas. The Minneapolis Super Bowl Host Committee estimated a couple years ago that the February 2018 event would bring about $350-400 million to the local economy. The New York Times said those numbers were a bit exaggerated, but that’s still going to leave a lot of cities unhappy with a huge windfall getting exported to a place outside the country that doesn’t even have a full-time NFL team.

Khan wants to get the most out of his investment and maybe the World Cup is a stronger possibility. But don’t count on a Super Bowl going to London any time soon.
Thanks for your visiting on this page , We hope this post can be a good reference for you and provide useful information for you :-).
This article is sourced from:

Patriots considered Baker Mayfield as Tom Brady’s successor, claims agent | Sport

Baker Mayfield’s agent says the New England Patriots and New York Jets were both in the market for his client before the quarterback was drafted No1 overall by the Cleveland Browns last weekend.
The Jets ended up picking Sam Darnold in the No3 spot but Jack Mills told the Business of Sports podcast that the team would have preferred the former Oklahoma star. “When he visited the Jets, they pretty much said you’re our guy if you’re [still available at No3],” Mills said.
Mills added that the Patriots had also considered trading up for Mayfield as an eventual successor for Tom Brady, who will be 41 when the new season starts. “We had another team which is going to surprise you. Another team had said, ‘You may get a big surprise on draft day, at No2, if he’s available.’ And it was the Patriots,” Mills said. “They had [the 23rd and 31st picks] and they had two seconds [to decide whether to trade up]. We thought, ‘That’s gonna be a heck of a move, to get up that high from where they are.’ And of course he wasn’t available so we never knew if that was a reality or not.”
The Patriots ended up selecting quarterback Danny Etling in the seventh-round, although he is not considered to be a realistic candidate to replace Brady.
While much of focus of the last week has been on the new generation of quarterbacks drafted into the NFL, Brady says he intends to continue playing well into his fifth decade.
In an appearance at the Milken Institute Global Conference on Monday, Brady confirmed he will be back for the 2018 season and beyond after speculation his career would soon draw to a close. “I have personal goals,” the quarterback said. “I want to keep playing. I’ve said for a long time I want to play to my mid-40s. I was told three years, when I was 36-37, ‘You can’t keep playing; no one wins Super Bowls [at that age].’ It’s a great challenge for me. I think I’ve been challenged my whole life. I feel like I can do it.”
In January, the New England Patriots denied reports a rift had formed between team owner Robert Kraft, coach Bill Belichick and Brady. On Monday, Brady was asked if he was happy with the people he works with. “Yeah,” he said. “I would say absolutely. And in general, I’m a very happy person. I’m a very positive person. It’s just my personality, I always look at things as the glass is half full. I think there are different times; when you’ve been on the same team for a long time, you have relationships for a long time, they ebb and flow like every relationship. But there are no people I’d rather play for or be committed to than the team I’ve been with for a long time, and really the fans and the community.”

Brady will miss the Patriots’ voluntary pre-season workouts and acknowledged that his family have got “the short end of the stick in my life” due to to his commitment to football. His wife, Gisele Bundchen, has said in the past that she worries about the toll the sport takes on her husband’s body.
“Football is year-round for me. It’s a lot of thought, a lot of energy and emotion put into it, but I need to invest in [my family], too. My kids are 10, eight and five. They’re not getting younger, so I need to take time so I can be available to them, too. … I’ve really spent the last two or three months doing those things, and I think I’m really trying to fill my tank up so that when I do go back, I can go back and I think I’ll actually be, in my mind, a better player, a better teammate, because I’ll be really rejuvenated.”
Brady led the Patriots to a Super Bowl appearance last season but was denied a sixth championship victory by the Philadelphia Eagles.

Thanks for your visiting on this page , We hope this post can be a good reference for you and provide useful information for you :-).
This article is sourced from:

There was a method to the Saints’ draft madness. Really.

The Saints’ confusing draft moves were a reflection of a team that thinks differently about its picks.
DALLAS — A common, lingering question at the top of the NFL Draft is what were the New Orleans Saints doing? What were they thinking?
The Saints moved up 13 spots in the first round in a trade with the Green Bay Packers to select Texas-San Antonio defensive end Marcus Davenport at No. 14. The cost included their 2019 first-round draft pick.
Too much for a developing player from a small school, critics offered. A reach, others scolded.
But the Saints’ NFL peers know better. They are noticing the Saints’ recent method of draft business. The Saints in last year’s draft found instant defensive (cornerback Marshon Lattimore) and offensive (running back Alvin Kamara) playmakers along with other distinguishing rookie contributors.
I believe Davenport is a strong bet to continue the trend.
What was New Orleans thinking?
The key is they were thinking.
The Saints are drafting now with player learning methods at the forefront. Head coach Sean Payton believes players’ learning methods cross section in four ways — never struggles in education and in football learning; never struggles in education but struggles in football learning; struggles in education but never in football; struggles in both. He calls it good-good, good-bad, bad-good and bad-bad. He is fascinated in gauging the mental side of young players.
Payton recently told me this about the Saints’ newfound draft philosophy:
“We are working in the area of processing to help us as we try to become better in this area of identifying. We are measuring mental traits that have developed and finalized in that way since the player was probably 13 or 14 years old. You are testing focus, retention, re-focusing. You are testing attention. I’m excited about this area and we are exploring it fully. It may become a standard for learning about all rookie players.”
Payton said the Saints choose from a variety of 16 different tests, for example, one on a computer screen that shows 12 dots, three red and moving and players attempt to recall their original locations. Another shows letters on a computer screen that pop up in red and blue and rotate, slowly then faster. How does the player retain those colors and that movement?
The talent, the skill of the potential draftee is of course critical.
But how does he learn? Is he mentally wired, in a football sense, to succeed?
Those are the specific type of questions the Saints are asking. Those are the type of players they are drafting.
So, it was little surprise that the Saints took particular interest in Davenport, when Davenport — who is a hulking 6’6, 264 pounds of power, speed and promise — said this immediately after he was drafted:
”I was surprised when we first met at the Senior Bowl that they had me learn some of their stuff on defense. And then when I saw them again later in the draft process, they asked me about it and I remembered most of it.”
He spoke their language.
He nailed one of their biggest, developing draft metrics.
He became their target. An edge rusher, a primary need the Saints identified after last season. An effort player. A fortunate product of availability when NFL teams’ franchise quarterback needs early in the draft pushed him downward toward the middle of the first round. An explosive player. An aggressive player.
And here is the real key — a guy who fits right in with what the Saints are building in terms of talent mixed with mental temperament and learning makeup.
Every NFL team uses some facet of this approach.
But the Saints are exhibiting a knack for it that is prominent.
I expect Davenport to roll right in and create havoc on the Saints’ defense. I expect him to continue a trend of rookie impact players for the Saints. He is big, he is fast, and he displays special football gifts.
And this will help push him over the top — he pays attention. He’s a fast football learner. He’s hungry.
“They showed a lot of faith in me,” Davenport said. “I’m going to show them it was worth it.”

The Edmunds brothers — Tremaine and Terrell — were a historic, first-round hurricane. They are the first brothers selected in a first round. Linebacker Tremaine was No. 16 to Buffalo. safety Terrell was No. 28 to Pittsburgh.
Tremaine is going to a place where his head coach, Sean McDermott, will know exactly what to do with him. McDermott wants fast defense and Tremaine will make that Bills defense instantly faster. He was the most flexible, fastest linebacker in the draft and his East-West motor makes him a prize possibility at middle linebacker. Wherever he lines up, his ability to drop in pass coverage as well as sprint to the quarterback gives him rare versatility. Tremaine is going to be one of those guys that just shows up in NFL games.
Terrell said that, along with his parents, he had dinner with Pittsburgh coach Mike Tomlin during the draft process. He said his parents and Tomlin clicked.
Tomlin clicked with the parents.
Tomlin clicked with the player.
Pittsburgh took Terrell higher than he was projected. But their conviction on him never wavered. They see him as a player who can play multiple positions in the secondary and overall in the defense. I see that, too.
They see a guy who won’t get caught with his pants down. Even though on draft night he already did.
Terrell explained that he was in the bathroom when the Steelers called to select him.
“I didn’t even get the chance to zip up my pants and put on my belt when I ran out there to tell my parents what was happening,” Terrell said. “I was filled with joy.”
If you could hear the way he said it, the way he communicates with such ease and style, you can see why Pittsburgh made sure he was a Steeler.
I see a dynamic career ahead for this player.

NFL teams try not to pay much attention to all of the chatter and noise that rages on the outside. But they can’t help but hear it, notice it, when it comes from their peers.
And an example recently was at the annual NFL owner meetings in March in Orlando. More than once, you heard coaches and executives prefacing their remarks by saying “… like the Browns … who are just trying to win one game.”
Yes, that 0-16 Browns season a year ago makes every other team in the league feel better. At least we’re not the Browns, the feeling goes. You don’t think the Browns absorb that? Get that?
So, I believe that the selection of quarterback Baker Mayfield at No. 1 is in large part about the Browns selecting the quarterback who had the best makeup to shake it up. To dig this franchise out of its dungeon. You need a guy who can throw it, a guy who can lead, but most important for the Browns quarterback, a spark of immense energy was required. Someone built to embrace, not run from, the Browns soulful needs.
“It makes perfect sense to me, him there,” an NFL head coach told me. “I mean, why not? They’re trying to win one game over there (THERE “THEY” GO AGAIN). They need a lightening rod as much as a quarterback. You’re trying to break a deep-rooted, bad culture. With that quarterback, it is not going to be a dull situation.”
Thanks for your visiting on this page , We hope this post can be a good reference for you and provide useful information for you :-).
This article is sourced from:

What Is Reddit? A Quick Guide To Subreddits, AMAs & Reddit Gold

Michael Grothaus

01/05/2018 – 10:30am

A beginner's guide to the front page of the Internet.

Even if you don’t use it, you’ve probably heard of Reddit. Matter of fact, you’ve probably also heard it referred to as the “front page of the Internet”. Reddit was founded almost 12 years ago and since then has grown to become one of the most popular websites in the world.
The site currently boasts over 540 million monthly visitors and ranks as the sixth most-visited site in the world and the fourth most-visited site in the United States.
That’s great, you may say.
But just what is Reddit?
After all, one look at its front page and you can tell it doesn’t look like most traditional websites.
Here’s everything you need to know to understand this uber-popular site.
Reddit: A Bulletin Board System
At its most basic Reddit is a sharing website. But it’s not for sharing files. ert_main_wide_image/public/2018/04/screen_shot_2018-04-29_at_1.51.35_pm.jpg?itok=_0DKoDwG” alt=”” />

A subreddit is essentially a board within a board. Subreddits are places where people can share their link, images, or posts related to a certain topic. Users can then choose to follow certain subreddits according to their interests.
Subreddits can be very generic, like subreddits for movies, science, books, news, working out, etc. Or subreddits can be very, very niche–like subreddits for people who like to Photoshop arms onto birds.
A subreddit URL typically looks like this (using the bird example above): When discussing a subreddit it typical people use shorthand for it. For example, r/birdswitharms is the shorthand for the above-mentioned subreddit.
Reddit: Up And Down Voting
The last major beginner’s thing you need to know about Reddit is that users can vote on any post–and they can either upvote or downvote it. Upvoting means you like the post or finds it interesting or useful in some way. Downvoting means you don’t like the post.
Posts with more upvotes move up towards the top of subreddits, which make them more visible to readers. If a post in a subreddit gets enough upvotes, it can even appear on the front page of Reddit no matter what subreddit it is from. If this happens, the post is guaranteed to be read by millions of people around the world.
It’s the Reddit homepage that is the reason Reddit is often referred to as the “front page of the Internet”. Once a post lands up here, traditional and other media outlets often pick up many of the stories, giving the post a chance to be seen by people who normally would never read Reddit.

Hey, thank for your visiting to this post . I wish this post provide some useful informations about mobile technology for you.
Thanks…!!! 🙂
The contents of this article are sourced from:

Nokia 3 review: Not the one on release, and not the one in 2018

We weren’t that enamoured with the Nokia 3 when we reviewed it last summer, and suffice it to say that time is even more unkind to budget phones than it is to flagships. The Nokia 3 wasn’t our recommended budget phone in 2017, and it sure isn’t in 2018 either.
The trouble is that despite unveiling a raft of new handsets this year, Nokia hasn’t got anything quite in this price bracket coming up, so what are the alternatives? Well, you could pay a bit more for last year’s Nokia 6 which has come down in price recently, alternatively, the upcoming Moto G6 Play looks like it might offer a fair bit more bang for your buck. 
Best to avoid the Nokia 3 though, in truth. Read on to remember why.
Jon’s original review continues below
The budget smartphone category has been in the doldrums this year. With prices rising for gadgets across the board (thanks, Brexit), manufacturers have found it tough to continue to improve their products while keeping prices low. The Motorola Moto G5 was actually worse than the Moto G4, and there hasn’t been a great deal of activity in the £100 to £200 price bracket since to liven things up.
It’s agaert_main_wide_image/public/2017/07/nokia_3_geekbench_4_alphr_1.png?itok=SoXS9EyV” alt=””/>

Battery life isn’t a disaster but, once again, the Nokia 3 falls behind its rivals, lasting 10hrs 40mins in our video-playback test. This means you’ll struggle to get through a day with moderate use. Move up to a Moto G4, Galaxy J5 or preferably the Lenovo P2 and you’ll get a longer-lasting phone.
Nokia 3 review: Camera
The camera is usually where budget phones suffer the most, and the Nokia 3 is no different. It certainly doesn’t help that it starts with a collection of specifications that look they came from a two-year-old handset.
At the rear you’re getting an 8-megapixel, f/2.0 camera with very few mod cons: no phase detect or laser autofocus, no optical image stabilisation, no dual camera like the Honor 6X. It can shoot video, but only at 720p. What is this, 2012? The front camera is another 8-megapixel affair with no flash.
Photographs produced with the Nokia’s camera are, to say the least, uninspiring. In low light, images and video are bland and soft in focus, while in good light things don’t get much better with the camera frequently overexposing and burning out the highlights. 
The two-year-old Moto G4 has a better camera than this and the Lenovo P2, although a touch more expensive, produces far crisper and more vibrant stills.
Nokia 3 review: Verdict
I really, really, really wanted to like the Nokia 3. I’ve always loved the way the company designs its smartphones, and the look and feel of this model is classic Nokia. I like the fact that it runs pure Android and that it has 16GB of storage. It’s also good that you can expand that via microSD. It’s an attractive, practical handset and one that’s cheaper than most of its rivals, too.
In every other respect, however, the Nokia 3 lags behind. Performance is below par. Battery life is below average and the camera is disappointing. Hopefully, when the Nokia 5 and 6 arrive they’ll be a significant step up.

Thank you for your visit on this page
The content sourced from:

​Fotcase Camera Strap Launches on Kickstarter

Fotcase is a new camera strap equipped with a special X-bracing on the back, which distributes weight proportionally across both shoulders. Fotcase starts a 30-days crowdfunding campaign today on with a goal of $15000. The first mass-produced Fotcase straps are expected in November 2018.
Fotcase Press Release
Fotcase – The strap for the camera and the photographer!

Fotcase is a camera strap equipped with a special X-bracing on the back, which distributes weight proportionally across both shoulders. Due to the half rings, Fotcase strap achieves maximum comfort. With the Fotcase strap you can be sure that your camera is perfectly safe, even in the most surprising of situations.

Anton Semenov, co-founder and creator of Fotcase: “A year ago, I faced a problem.  None of my camera straps could solve two problems at once: maximum comfort and a stylish look. The straps on my neck and shoulders were not comfortable and looked awkward. And so the first prototype of Fotcase was produced – the world’s first strap not only for the camera, but also for the photographer!”

Fotcase team starts a 30-days crowdfunding campaign on with a goal of $15000. The first mass-produced Fotcase straps are expected in November 2018.

The advantages of Fotcase:

No weariness – it does not matter how much your camera weighs or how long you are taking photos – you won’t get tired. The Fotcase strap equally distributes weight and does not cause spinal curvature due to a special X-bracing on the back.

Camera always at hand – your camera is always ready-at-hand like a gunslinger’s holster. Take pictures fast and never miss a single moment.

From amateur to professional SLR cameras – Fotcase is suitable for all cameras with a 1/4″ tripod mount.

Perfect for any style – Italian leather, with two colors to choose from. Fotcase looks stylish with any clothes.

Main leather strap supports up to 500 Kg – The main leather belt comes with a stainless steel carabiner which supports up to 500 kg. So you can rest assured that your camera is safe and sound.

Double fall protection – Even if the main belt camera mount unscrews, the second safety cord will not allow it to fall and break. Your camera is perfectly safe and sound.

Technical specs

·         Strap leather thickness: 4mm

·         Strap width: 3cm

·         Strap weight: 600 grams

Fotcase will come in two versions:

Cross one – for one camera, for those who like travelling, working in the Studio or photographing light-handed.

Cross two – helps work actively with two cameras, as it enables taking photos on different lenses with different focal distances.
There is a range of sizes for any constitution from a fragile girl to a massive guy
Size S-M (up to 155-170 cm height
Size M-L (170-175 cm height)
Size L-XL (175 cm and higher)

Your Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Thank you for your interest to visit this page . I hope this review can be an additional reference for you.
The content sourced from:

Moshi Tego Review: Sleek, Urban Backpack

Moshi Tego Review: Sleek, Urban Backpack is a post by Josh Smith from Gotta Be Mobile.
The Moshi Tego backpack is a sleek urban backpack. In black it looks like it could easily pass on the set of a sci-fi movie thanks to bold lines and an ultra modern look. I’ve been using this backpack as my go to around town bag for over a month and it’s perfectly suited for day to day use. The Tego is $169 in black and silver.
I use the Tego to carry a 15-inch MacBook Pro with TouchBar, various chargers, cables, a review phone and occasionally my Sony A6500 with an external microphone and a few extra batteries. I also keep the Moshi ionslim 5K USB C battery back inside, plugged into the integrated USB cord that allows me to plug a USB cable in and charge my phone on the go with the backpack completely sealed.

The bag’s eye catching design combines with a 3M Scotchlite reflective strip for added visibility at night. Even though the bag will draw attention, it’s designed to keep your gear safe in the city. The zippers are always concealed when the Tego is on your back, and there is even a RFID Shield Pocket that you can use to protect personal information.

Moshi Tego Backpack

The Moshi Tego looks amazing, protects your gear from thieves and includes an RFID Shield pocket.

What You’ll Love
Bold and Functional Design is Epicly Futuristic
Small Size, But Fits a 15-inch MacBook Pro Easily
Built In USB Charging Port
Reflective Strip Keeps You Visible at Night

What You’ll Miss
Open Interior Storage Isn’t Great for Bulky Items Like Cameras.

Buy at Moshi

Inside I slide my 15-inch MacBook Pro into the padded laptop sleeve, which also fits a smaller 13-inch notebook easily. I don’t always bring my iPad with me, but there is a very nice secondary sleeve that fits the 9.7-inch or 10.5 inch iPad Pro. There are also a few slim pockets that are great for organizing cables and holding camera batteries. There is also a small pocket to hold sunglasses safely, which is super handy.
The rest of the bag is open storage, which is handy for holding a jacket or soft items. I normally use this to hold my Sony a6500 camera and a microphone. It works, but the Moshi Arcus is a better fit if you need to carry additional gear that you want to protect.

I like that the zippers are always hidden, so I don’t need to worry about someone opening them while I am walking downtown. The design also keeps water from getting near the zippers and the material is weather resistant.
On the side there is a USB plug that I plug a Lightning or a USB C cable into to charge my phone while I wear the backpack. The other end inside plugs into any battery pack with a normal USB plug.

The overall design is what really sets this bag apart, with bold lines that are also functional by keeping the zippers hidden and water away from any entry point. The straps are comfortable even with a full load and the bag sits nicely on my back. The only exterior storage is the RFID shield pocket, which is a handy place to stash extra cash or other slim important items.

15 Best MacBook Pro Cases and Covers
Moshi iGlaze

$54.95 and $64.95 at Moshi

 The Moshi iGlaze is a slim, hard MacBook Pro case that covers your new MacBook in a clear, but slightly glazed, protective shell. 
This 2016 and 2017 MacBook Pro case clips on to your new laptop, providing protection to the top and the bottom. I’ve used a version of this for the 12-inch MacBook and love that it doesn’t show wear easily thanks to the glazed finish. 
With slightly raised feet on the bottom it stays in place when you are working on it and all vents remain open. Any added weight or bulk is minimal and well worth the tradeoff for the protection this offers. 
This is available for both the 15-inch MacBook Pro with TouchBar and the 13-inch MacBook Pro with TouchBar and without.  

Moshi Tego Review: Sleek, Urban Backpack is a post by Josh Smith from Gotta Be Mobile.
Thank you for your interest to visit this page . I hope this review can be an additional reference for you.
The content sourced from:

Will the T-Mobile/Sprint merger be good for consumers?

Unbelievable! The average money stolen in ransomware attacks in 2017 was 950 Euros!
Did you know this?

As the corporations become one, they will start streamlining operations for efficiency, as this could have some concrete benefits for consumers, so long as some of the savings are also passed on to the customer. But, as the big four become the big three, the reduced competition could also lead to increased prices—as well as potential opposition from the government.
The promise: cheap 5G for all
To sell to merger, the new T-Mobile has set up a website with a sales pitch for its vision of the future, called 5G for all. We are promised a swath of network upgrades and huge extension of the 5G-ready spectrum—an attractive scenario made all the more closer to reality by the merger.

Money will be moving, but who’s going to cash in? / © AndroidPIT

T-Mobile’s CEO John Legere will remain the head of the new company and promises “a fierce competitor with the network scale to deliver more for consumers and businesses in the form of lower prices, more innovation, and a second-to-none network experience – and do it all so much faster than either company could on its own,” while Sprint’s CEO, Marcelo Claure insists that the unification will “only benefit the US consumer.”
The combined customers of the new T-Mobile (about 70 million) will still be smaller than AT&T and Verizon’s customer bases but no doubt T-Mobile will only continue its strategy of aggressive expansion and campaign to offer its low- and mid-range LTE into rural areas. This network expansion will no doubt require thousands of new jobs and escalate a 5G arms race with Verizon and AT&T, which could end up accelerating the development of the new standard across the country.
The hidden cost
But consolidation, efficiency and streamlining come various cost-cutting measures and the elimination of redundancies: we can expect layoffs in the most vulnerable areas: retail; customer service; technicians; middle management. The closure of stores, franchises and call centers will be inevitable, with potentially thousands of venues being shut down.

Retail stores and franchises will take a hit. / © AndroidPIT

Aside from layoffs, the other potential problem would be the reduction in competition. How much of a difference will the loss of the smallest challenger in the carrier market make?
The merger of T-Mobile and Sprint  will up also affect the small-time prepaid suppliers they own. For example MetroPCS and Boost Mobile will no longer have much incentive to compete for customers now that they are both under the T-Mobile umbrella.
With only three big players in the telecoms market, it could also be easier for T-Mobile, AT&T and Verizon to collude and keep prices above a certain point for the benefit of all. Thanks to the weakening of net neutrality rules by the FCC, we could see various services throttled or zero-rated by the different operators as they carve up larger sections of the market for themselves.
That’s where the problem of government regulation comes in, and why the new T-Mobile’s website aims to convince the US government as much as the consumer.
T-Mobile leans on US fear of Chinese competition
The T-Mobile CEOs are keen to paint the combined corporation as a champion of American interest on the world stage:
“Global tech leadership for the next decade is at stake and ONLY the New T-Mobile will have the network and spectrum capacity to quickly create a broad and deep 5G network in the first few years of the 5G innovation cycle.”

In any discussion about US tech regulation, China never seems far away. / © AndroidPIT

Who is this intended for? The FCC, under Ajit Pai’s leadership, has been proven ready to back big telecom to the hilt, but the Department of Justice, on the other hand, has been less friendly to massive mergers (notably, AT&T’s bid for Time Warner).
So it’s possible that the new T-Mobile will face scrutiny from the DoJ on antitrust grounds. To preempt this, T-Mobile is using the same fearmongering strategy that Mark Zuckerberg had in his playbook against the potential breakup of Facebook. Namely, the argument that America needs its big tech to get even bigger in order to stay ahead of China in the global economy.
“It is absolutely imperative that the U.S. extends the global innovation, technology and economic leadership it seized during the 4G era” according to T-Mobile’s press release. “Unfortunately, other countries see this opportunity as well and have taken bold steps that have given them a head start. CTIA ranks the U.S. behind both China and South Korea in 5G preparedness…The U.S. must move quickly and our leadership can do just that.”  
Monopoly at home vs competition abroad
Here’s the Catch 22 for lawmakers facing this strategy from aggressive tech companies, especially under the ‘America first’, protectionist-leaning Trump administration. Does this meaning protecting the consumer choice of the average customer at home? Or does it mean holding onto America’s leadership on the world stage at all costs?
It’s not an easy choice. Even backing the new T-Mobile involves weighing the loss of retail and service jobs against the new jobs created in construction. In its manifesto, T-Mobile deploys both the carrot (expanded service, faster 5G), and the stick (competition from other nations).

Opinion by Nicholas Montegriffo

The government shouldn’t let China be used as a threat to stop it protecting US consumers
What do you think?

It’s a pretty tasty-looking carrot, to be sure. But it’s still just promises at this stage, which means we have to take T-Mobile at its word. Given T-Mobile’s sketchy track record (let’s not forget, this company was made to pay over $90M back in 2014 for knowingly scamming its customers with bogus charges), it might be wise not to take their claims ofpassing savings on to the consumer at face value.
What do you think? Will the merger of T-Mobile and Sprint be good for consumers, or for America?

Thank you for your visit on this page
The content sourced from:

Sony Xperia XZ2 review

JAPANESE PHONE MAKER Sony unveiled its latest top-end handset, the Sony Xperia XZ2 at Mobile World Conference (MWC) earlier this year in Barcelona, touting the flagship as a smartphone with a big design upgrade over previous releases.
As a result, the Xperia XZ2 boasts a fresh 3D glass surface that creates a seamless form that Sony claims is more comfortable in the hand. It also offers up some of those well-known features from its predecessors, such as an IP65/IP68 dust-tight, waterproof design.
But how does this high-spec handset compare to its rivals, such as the Samsung Galaxy S9, or Google Pixel 2? Read on to find out.
DesignThe first thing you’ll notice about Sony’s latest release is that, unlike Samsung, they’ve made a big effort to update the design of the new devices over its previous releases. As a result, Xperia XZ2 boasts a fresh 3D glass surface that creates a seamless form that makes it look and feel a lot nicer to hold in the hand.

Despite being made of glass, you’ll be pleased to know that Sony has kept true to the rugged design of earlier Xperia models. Thanks to its dust-resistant and waterproof IP65 and IP68 certification – the highest possible waterproof rating – Sony claims that the Xperia XZ2 will still be protected against spills and drops.
This, Sony said, is thanks to a new, tough Corning Gorilla Glass 5 exterior and metal frame which makes it the toughest device its ever made, apparently.

In reality, we can see what they mean. The Xperia XZ2 feels super tough and sturdy in the hand, but as a result, it feels much heavier than its predecessor. Looking at the specs you’ll see why, as it’s more than 40g weightier than the Xperia XZ1 at 198g. It’s also over 3mm thicker, measuring 11.1mm at its thickest point, meaning that while it feels sleeker, it is a bit more cumbersome than previous Xperia flagships. 
Saying that, it’s by far our favourite Xperia design yet, as it feels really well made while also looking the part.
DisplayBoasting a 13 per cent bigger screen than its predecessor, the Xperia XZ2, the new and improved flagship handset features a 5.7in FHD+ display with an 18:9 aspect ratio for nicer, wider viewing experiences.

The display on the XZ2, which boasts a super-vibrant screen that uses the firm’s Bravia TV technology for the ultimate contrast and colour vibrancy, is nothing short of superb. While not quite in the league of the Sony Xperia XZ Premium’s 5.5in 4K IPS display, the XZ2 still offers crystal-clear images and is stunning to look at. Being one of its most impressive features, text and images look sharp and touch operations are smooth on pages and apps, too.
As for the IPS technology, this means wide viewing angles alongside deep colour representation even from tight angles. And brightness is the best we’ve ever seen on an Xperia phone, appearing clear even in very light conditions.
Performance and batteryThe Sony Xperia XZ2 runs Android 8.0 Oreo powered by Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 845 processor alongside 4GB of RAM, offering a much faster CPU and GPU speed than previous models as well as an upgraded Qualcomm modem that offers download speeds up to 1.2Gbps.

Using the phone to send messages from time to time and check social media notifications, we found that the Xperia XZ2’s 3180mAh battery lasted on average about a full day before running out of juice.
Obviously, battery life depends on how you use the phone over the course of a day, but you’ll not want to have to charge it again before the end of the day. With the Xperia XZ2, using it almost constantly on full brightness, watching videos, browsing the web and listening to music, for example, its battery lasted until the late evening, as expected, before needing a re-juice, after being unplugged early morning, around 8am.
In terms of general performance, we found the device about as fast as the Xperia XZ1 that came before it, with no lag even when we ran power-demanding apps with augmented reality features. The operating system has been skinned with a custom user interface in good old Sony fashion, but unlike many previous Sony Mobile releases, this is very light and unnoticeable.
SoftwareAs we mentioned earlier, Google’s Android 8.0 Oreo mobile operating system on the Xperia XZ2 hasn’t been skinned much at all, meaning that Sony’s custom user interface is very similar to Google’s original, unskinned OS.
As with its predecessor, the XZ1, Sony’s latest phone touts some rather unique but fun camera tools, including the 3D scanner app, which can now apparently work in selfie mode, without needing to get someone to do it for you. This means you can send 3D selfie of yourself to people if you so wish, even when you’re all alone or if you have zero friends and you’re just sending it to yourself. Aww.
CameraThe Sony Xperia XZ2 is said to be the “world’s first smartphone to be able to support 4K HDR movie recording” thanks to an upgraded 19MP Motion Eye camera, which touts ISO levels of 12,800 and a 960FPS FHD slo-mo video capture, meaning it can capture in Full HD moving image (previously in 720p in the Xperia XZ1) for super slow-mo recordings. 

The camera performed really well in low light conditions, and we found the still images taken with the Xperia XZ2’s rear-facing camera were super impressive, appearing crisp, clear, and full of natural colour. They were also snapped and processed super-fast. Autofocus is swift, and the camera is able to focus on the background and foreground aspects of an image instantly.
The quality of the image has also been improved here, with the XZ2 leaving the scan processing to the server to improve the speed.
Connectivity and storageThe Xperia XZ2 has a USB Type-C port, which is pretty standard these days. It also supports Bluetooth, WiFi and 3G/4G mobile internet connectivity, as you’d expect.
As for storage, the Xperia XZ2 has 64GB of internal space, with the ability to take a whopping 400GB external microSD card for more videos and images.
In shortCosting £699 SIM-free, the Sony Xperia XZ2 is cheaper than most flagship Android devices out there such as the Google Pixel 2 XL (£719), or the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (£869), and obviously much cheaper than the new iPhone X. However, it’s still a whole £100 more than the XZ1 was at launch, so Sony obviously felt like it was a big enough upgrade to justify a hefty price increase.
We’re not so sure. It’s obviously seen a big update from its predecessor, but maybe more of a change than an improvement. Its innards are more powerful but we don’t think there’s much of a difference in everyday performance unless you’re a big gamer.
Nevertheless, if you’re wanting a super high-spec phone that works like a dream that is cheaper than most of its rivals, this has to be the best Android phone out there right now for the price. All in all, it’s a brilliantly designed phone that showcases Sony’s determination to keep improving the Xperia smartphone series, making it better with every release, no matter how minor.Both the Xperia XZ2 and XZ2 Compact are available now in Liquid Silver, Liquid Black, Deep Green and Ash Pink colour options. µ 
The goodSleek design, vibrant screen, good camera with unique features, excellent general performance.
The badThe design is much bulkier and heavier than previous versions.
The uglyPricier than previous Sony phones at launch.
Bartender’s score7/10

Thank you have visited this post . We wish could be additional information about technology for you